Or playing apples to apples Austerlitz
One can clearly see how the French won so dramatically after a few games of Pub Battles Austerlitz. The Allied army was completely disorganized and barely functioning as a whole when compared to the French army. This wasn’t the sort of superiority that is necessarily evident when comparing numbers, weapons, or even morale, all things that are easily translated to combat stats in wargames. The difference was primarily in organization and doctrine. That, and the fact that Napoleon had completely psyched out his adversaries in the campaign leading up to the battle!
Considering all that, how can it be any fun at all to play the Allies? Command Post games has gone farther than many other systems in the way it treats the opening battle. Kudos to them! If you’re going to publish a game on the Battle of Austerlitz, that’s pretty much what you have to do.
However, as simply a player of the Pub Battles system, I have a few more options. One of the most powerful design facets of Pub Battles is its “Free Game” architecture. Since Pub Battles, with its Kriegspiel inspired system, focuses on Command and Control, not combat, it lends itself to a very powerful variant.
Simply allow Allied players to organize their army into as many, or as few, Corps as they like, and raise the leadership ratings from 2 to 3. , and you now have two very similar armies. Of course, two identical armies facing each other can be kind of stale in and of itself, but there are still some key differences inherent in the battle which can be carried over seamlessly to this variant. Allow the Allies to use all the HQ blocks which creates Fog of War, and use the historical French entry, which requires two turns for their full army to arrive.
This means that the Allied player has a brief advantage that they need to use as soon as the sun rises. The French must scramble to meet an uncertain threat. Because this is Pub Battles, there will never be a perfect strategy. The chit draw and combat guarantee that. You can try your best to outmaneuver your opponent, but the chit draw and Alter Turn Order rolls can simulate the same unpredictable outcomes that bedevil real commanders. In addition, combat is never a sure thing. The best you can hope for is likely outcomes, at worst, it’s unlikely outcomes. It’s as if a kriegspiel referee, a really good kriegspiel referee, is taking your combat and saying. “Well, what if this happens?” Pub Battles rewards flexibility, and not letting circumstances get into your head, and focusing on possibilities.
Back to our scenario, with its Allied army that matches the French. How can this be? Obviously, not very likely, since it didn’t even come close to happening, but what if it did? A disaffected French Superior officer, say another Napoleon, (because no army is big enough for two Napoleons), approaches the Tsar and says that he can give him an army as great as the French! The Tsar eagerly accepts the offer. Then the army also eagerly accepts this new and very different doctrine. Go ahead and imagine how this might be possible. I submit it is certainly more believable than wondering what if the Russians had AK-47s and T-34s at Austerlitz!
I’m about to try my first game played this way. Now I play double blind solo, so I won’t be using all the Fog of War that would be present in a two player game, but I can certainly play as though it was there.
5 thoughts on “Austerlitz in a Mirror”
Hi, I have just get version of Austerlitz.
Coud you explain clearly the victory condition of the Austerlitz games if their is no optional forces ?
I don’t understand : “the french get 4 x their regular points for victory”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It means that whatever victory level was achieved, The French get X4 victory points. So even if they are broke and the allies get X4 victory points, the French still get X4.
The outcome is still the same. If the Allies rout the French, they still have won, but the points can be used to gauge how well the French fought, considering the odds were against them. Plus, in the case of a draw, it gives another metric for victory. So in a tournament, it could be used to decide who advances to the next round.
In a pub, it can be used to determine who buys the next round. 😃
So, I had a try with the game this morning : 21 losses for the austrians / 28 losses for the french ( with only Murat) at the 8 turn.
21 X 4 = 84 points for the french ?
That is correct. It is also why I don’t really use points, myself.
Of course, Napoleon would have sent the points results back to Paris, claiming divine status was now his due!😄
Thank you. Good idea this optional force in Austerlitz : enough to push the austrian down the Pratzen, under the teef of the french army
LikeLiked by 1 person